Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter18

Text File | 1996-07-07 | 45KB | 780 lines

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 20, 1976, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 18.

As I speak with you today, we are drawing ever closer to being
swallowed up by the evils unleashed two generations ago by a tight
network of Foundation Trustees. Operating under a false cloak of
philanthropy, supposedly for the benefit of others, they actually
launched long-range programs designed to grab everything for
themselves.

Claiming to improve education in the cause of freedom, they actually
began replacing education with indoctrination in the cause of
collectivism. And while painting themselves as champions of peace,
they have led the world into war after war on the road to their
version of "peace"--that is, an all-powerful WORLD GOVERNMENT with
themselves in control.

Blinded by the insatiable greed for power, they could not see that
they were opening Pandora's box, setting forces in motion that would
ultimately prove impossible to control. Only recently, with disaster
looming up fast, have the present-day successors to those original
Trustees begun awakening to this fact, too late to regain control. Now
only the truth spread far and wide can avert total catastrophe.

Two years ago the United States of America plunged over the brink of a
devastating economic collapse as the result of deliberate measures to
create "stagflation", as I described in my 1973 book THE CONSPIRACY
AGAINST THE DOLLAR. But the process was arrested part way down because
other aspects of the Master Plan for world domination were slipping
behind schedule.

As I have related in detail in previous tapes, factors such as the
still concealed Fort Knox Gold and Plutonium Scandals, reverses in the
Middle East, Indira Gandhi's upset of the CIA in India, and other
things have caused our Unseen Rulers enormous difficulties for over 18
months. But time is running out, and it is do-or-die for those who
seek to enslave us. So now the United States has at last been pried
loose from its temporary economic foothold and we are falling slowly
but helplessly like a dreamer in a nightmare toward the dreaded
economic depression far below.

Politically, the phantom election plan I revealed last month by which
Nelson Rockefeller still plans to become America's chief executive is
proceeding so far exactly as planned. Sixty-eight per cent of the
voting precincts nation-wide had voting machines on November 2, 1976,
and where they jammed all across the country there was no provision
for paper ballots! Thousands of ballots were lost in certain areas,
the legality of thousands of others is being challenged, and re-counts
are under way in some places. The net result, exactly as planned, was
an extremely close popular vote and no landslide for anyone. President
Gerald Ford thought he had the election "in the bag", having been
promised by Nelson Rockefeller that he would carry New York State, but
the pained expression on Ford's face as his wife delivered his
concession statement on November 3 was nothing compared to the shock
that awaits Jimmy Carter if the plan now under way succeeds.
Meanwhile, as the stage is being set for economic and political shocks
in America, we drift ever closer to war and a "Declaration of National
Emergency" that could spell the end of our freedoms, and the dangerous
Intelligence gap created by Henry Kissinger continues.

When I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17 on October 26, last month,
I mentioned that the Soviet Union already knew where our lost Phoenix
Missile was in the North Sea but had not retrieved it. I had just
learned of the missile's location and revealed it in that tape. On
October 27, the following day, as soon as the tape was released, I
also relayed it to Military Intelligence. That same day Navy spokesmen
told the press that they still had not located the Phoenix; but using
the information I relayed to them, the Navy found and retrieved the
Phoenix Missile on October 31. The United States Government would have
you believe it is mere coincidence that they suddenly found the
Phoenix after I revealed its location, even though the Navy had spent
six weeks in a fruitless search prior to that!

There are also those who would have you believe that General George S.
Brown, the top military officer in the United States, met with me for
more than an hour on September 16, 1976 in his Pentagon office out of
idle curiosity. And especially there are many who want you to believe
there will be no reason for the Soviet Union to do as I have charged,
planting underwater-launched nuclear missiles within our own
territorial waters; but nothing, my friends, could be further from the
truth. What the Soviet Union has done and is doing is completely
logical and to be expected if we look at it from their point of view.
As Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, leader of the Conservative Party in
England, recently said, and I quote:

"The danger is our Western tendency to assume that other people will
apply our own standards and values. When considering international
matters, the important thing is not to look at other nations as if we
were standing in their shoes but as if they were standing in their
shoes."

If you depend, as most Americans do, on the controlled major media for
your understanding of the world, you will never learn to think this
way nor can you hope to grasp the real issues that govern military
survival; yet such understanding is essential if we are to see how to
correct our dangerous situation.

One organization which in my opinion does do an excellent job of
clarifying matters of defense and national security is the American
Security Council located at Boston, Virginia. Their zip is 22713. I
recommend the Council as an excellent source of information for every
concerned American.

To help in understanding the threat we now face and how we got into
such a position, I will discuss the following three topics today:

Topic #1--THE MUSHROOMING DEBATE OVER SOVIET MILITARY POWER

Topic #2--WHY THE SOVIET UNION WANTS NUCLEAR WAR

Topic #3--HOW GOVERNMENTAL AND PRESS SECRECY ARE DESTROYING OUR
CHANCES FOR PEACE.

Topic #1--Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has said over and over
again for nearly a decade, quote:

"Detente, or nuclear holocaust; there is no third way."

With this in mind, public discussion of American-Soviet relations has
focused for years on the alleged happy fruits of detente--the growing
thaw between East and West, etc.--but lately there has been an ominous
change. President Ford dropped the word "detente" from his active
vocabulary, and mounting of concern over the ragged condition of NATO
forces has been expressed increasingly by European and American
leaders.

Just last week two so-called prestigious groups burst upon the public
scene to churn up controversy over the issues of mounting Soviet
military power. First, on November 11 came the "Committee for the
Present Danger" urging presumed President-elect Carter to increase
military spending, instead of decreasing it as promised during the
election campaign. Then three days later a study group financed by the
Rockefeller Foundation proposed the opposite--that we undertake joint
military reductions with the Soviet Union, perhaps initiating the
process with selected unilateral reductions of our own. And the
warnings continue!

Just three days ago a representative of Boeing Aerospace Company
testified before Congress that in case of nuclear war, 98% of the
Soviet population would survive because of the elaborate Civil Defense
precautions being taken there. By contrast, of course, the United
States has no Civil Defense program worthy of the name. Obviously
detente is fading from the official scene rapidly. According to the
Kissinger formula, that means nuclear holocaust is on its way. But
where did he get that formula?

The word "detente" is just another word for what was termed "peaceful
coexistence" in the early 60's, and the Kissinger formula first
emerged in October 1959 in the form, quote:

"Peaceful coexistence or nuclear holocaust--there is no third way."

But the speaker then was not Henry Kissinger; it was Nikita
Khrushchev.

The peaceful coexistence idea which later became so-c alled "detente"
began 20 years ago when Khrushchev announced a major new Soviet policy
line--namely, that war with the West was not inevitable after all,
contrary to the teachings of Lenin. Instead, the nuclear age had made
peaceful coexistence necessary. To most Westerners, this sounded like
"live and yet live"; but to the Soviet Union it meant only the
avoidance of a war which could destroy the Soviet Union. It was all
right to continue to break off chunks of the free world by intrigue,
subversion, and so-called "wars of national liberation", such as those
which have occurred in Vietnam, Angola, and elsewhere. The Soviet
Union concentrated on selling the idea of peaceful coexistence for
five years from 1956 to 1961, ably assisted by their allies here in
the United States.

Then in 1961 a major new phase began as John F. Kennedy became
president of the United States. For decades the State Socialists, who
run the Soviet Union, had been in alliance with and supported by the
Corporate Socialists whose control over the United States was drawing
ever more complete. Now at long last the time was ripe to launch their
well-orchestrated joint program that was to lead to complete
dictatorial control of the United States by the Corporate Socialists,
Soviet conquest of vast areas of the world, piecemeal, with Corporate
Socialist assistance, and finally joint domination of the entire world
by the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance.

The basic idea of the program was for the strength and resolve of the
United States to be undermined and sapped while the Soviet Union would
be enabled to forge ahead into unprecedented world power. Communism
would be made to appear to be the wave of the future, while American
morale and faith in our free system of government would be steadily
eroded. Finally according to plan, the United States would be in the
process of increasing encirclement and vulnerability, more and more
countries becoming Soviet satellites with the unseen help of American
Corporate Socialists who would share in the spoils. Economic disaster,
military vulnerability, and the collapse of our own self-confidence
would, according to plan, open the door for dictatorship here in
America.

The single, most critical step in this long-range plan began to be
taken in 1961--the progressive shut-off of critical research and
development programs for future military technology.

If research uncovers a basic new concept at a given point in time, it
will ordinarily be 5 to 15 years before it can be translated into a
new operational technology. In between there must be development,
experimentation, evaluation, and full-scale production programs. By
the same token, if research and development are cut off, at some point
5 to 15 years later you will not have the new technology available
that would otherwise have come into being.

Early justifications for the dwindling R&D program were based on fond
new hopes for disarmament in connection with the new Soviet stance in
favor of peaceful coexistence. Later, as the conflict in Vietnam grew
into a major war, it became easier to leave important R&D items out of
the already swollen Defense budget.

Another key ingredient in the overall plan was to be the use of Cuban
troops as proxies in Soviet so-called "wars of national liberation" in
Latin America and elsewhere. The Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961, a few
short months after Kennedy took office, could have produced a serious
setback for the Rockefeller-Soviet plans for overthrow of numerous
governments, so Kennedy's advisers carefully steered him away from
making the invasion a success.

Meanwhile the Soviet Union constructed long-range plans to take
advantage of the American disadvantage in military technology that was
being arranged to occur in the mid-1970's. While our R&D began to
decline, theirs accelerated. By knowing exactly what to expect, the
Soviet Union was able to target its military development toward
achievement of a dominant position 15 years later; and that time has
now arrived.

In 1962, however, a gamble by Nikita Khrushchev almost caused the
whole plan to come apart. For more than a year a prominent United
States Senator, Kenneth Keating, had been sounding warnings that
offensive nuclear missiles were being placed in Cuba by the Soviet
Union; but his charges were denied by the Administration, just as my
charges about Soviet underwater missiles are being plausibly denied
now. But President Kennedy finally decided to look into it himself
personally, instead of accepting blind assurances that there was
nothing to it from his advisers. He found out that the charges were
true and the Cuban Missile Crisis was upon us.

The Cuban Missile Crisis led to the elimination from the scene of both
Kennedy and Khrushchev. First, as I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER
No. 3 for August 1975, President Kennedy was murdered because he was
becoming increasingly dangerous to the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance. He
had come into office lacking any real grasp of the realities of
international politics--but he was learning, and learning fast. It was
clearly only a matter of time before he would get around to reversing
the cutoff of our critical R&D programs. Already he was initiating
steps intended to turn off our involvement in Vietnam. Khrushchev, for
his part, took longer to oust since his power had to be chipped away
carefully by his enemies in the Kremlin; but finally he was removed
for jeopardizing the long-range plan of conquest with a dangerous
gamble that failed.

Looking ahead toward the increasing opportunities that would present
themselves for the Soviet Union to benefit at America's expense, the
"Institute of the United States of America" was founded early in the
1960's in Moscow. This Institute, whose purpose is to study the
vulnerabilities of the United States, was founded with the help of
financing from the Rockefeller Foundation.

Once the Oval Office was inhabited by Lyndon Johnson, the grand plan
proceeded onward without further difficulty! Secretary of Defense
Robert McNamara played an especially important role in several ways.
The period during which he served, from 1961 to 1968, was one in which
research and development carried out prior to the R&D cutoff would
potentially be continuing to bear fruit; but McNamara, doing the
bidding of those who had placed him in that position, succeeded in
causing the cancellation of important advanced weapons programs,
decommissioning of many Defense installations, physical scrapping of
huge quantities of Defense materiel, and costly concentration of
effort on ill-fated programs, such as the F-111 multipurpose Air Force
Navy fighter. He also championed the impressive-sounding theory of
warfare called "Measured Response" which guaranteed the escalation of
Vietnam into a major war by preventing clear-cut, decisive wins in
battle. As his reward for such 'valuable' service, McNamara was made
president of the World Bank. Can you imagine?

With the inauguration of President Richard M. Nixon of January 20,
1969, the Kissinger era of foreign policy emerged in full bloom.
Kissinger had been an influential voice in Government since the early
60's, thanks to his association with Nelson Rockefeller that began in
1955. Now he became one of the most important Rockefeller-Soviet
agents in the United States Government! Following the outlines of the
long-range plan, he became known as the architect of so-called
detente, repeating Khrushchev's old formula--"peaceful coexistence or
nuclear holocaust"--almost verbatim.

In 1972 detente entered a new phase. The SALT I Agreement was signed
in Moscow by President Nixon in May of that year. Meanwhile, the same
year, the Soviet Union launched the massive drive in Civil Defense
that has lately started attracting attention. The Soviet Union could
see that the long awaited opportunity to pull ahead of the United
States was fast approaching. That same year, 1972, saw the expansion
of so-called detente to Red China. Kissinger also played a central
role in this development; but far from promoting real peace, Kissinger
was undoing a golden opportunity for freedom for a quarter of the
world's people--and possibly peac e for the entire world.

What I am about to tell you is top secret, and I am revealing it for
the very first time.

Some years ago an international entrepreneur (whom I will call
"Smith") was in the act of selling a large European bank when he was
approached by a Chinese on a business venture involving a retired
Chinese general (whom I will call "Lee"). Lee had known both Chiang
Kai-shek and Mao Tse-tung very well during earlier revolutionary days,
and was still closely associated with six regional military chieftains
in Red China who were all genuinely anti-Soviet in every way.
Moreover, after the turmoil that took place in Red China in 1957 and
later, these Chinese military chieftains became completely
disenchanted and disgusted with Mao's program of using young hoodlums
to terrorize and murder all suspected opposition to his dictatorial
and oppressive programs. Mao's euphemistic term, cultural revolution,
for these cutthroat methods of bending the people to his will, did not
impress them. They contacted Lee and queried him as to the possibility
of getting American support in case they should decide to overthrow
Mao and establish a republic using the customary parliamentary form of
government. Those who preferred the security of Socialism would be
allowed to live in communes, but the government would foster a
free-market system for the country as a whole.

General Lee arranged through the United States Department of State to
send envoys through the Bamboo Curtain to make the necessary
arrangements; but someone in the State Department leaked the
information to Red Chinese officials, and all of the envoys were
quickly apprehended and put to death. Nevertheless General Lee
persisted. He asked Mr. Smith if he could arrange for broadcasting
equipment to inform all of Red China what was taking place, why the
military deemed it necessary to overturn Mao, and what form of
government would be established. Smith agreed to contact certain top
officials in the United States Government close to the President,
however General Lee emphasized that he must circumvent Henry Kissinger
and get the ear of Mr. Nixon only, since Lee did not trust Kissinger
nor anyone else in the State Department. The contacts were made, but
unfortunately a member of another agency heard of the plan and briefed
President Nixon about it in front of Kissinger. Almost immediately
arrangements were made for Kissinger to visit China to meet secretly
with Mao.

This meeting took place, and at the meeting Kissinger informed Mao
that he would be overthrown by a military coup unless Mao's regime
chose to cooperate with those who held the real power in the United
States. To sweeten the deal for Mao, certain secret agreements were
made concerning the future course of American relationships with the
Republic of China on Taiwan. The outgrowth of the meeting was
ping-pong diplomacy--the Nixon summit trip to Peking in February 1972,
and so-called detente between Red China and the United States. In
return, Mao Tse-tung's ironhanded dictatorship over Red China was
rendered secure once again. Red China would thus continue to be a
controllable threat to the Soviet Union. With any real threat to the
Soviet Union from the direction of Red China taken care of, the
Rockefeller-Soviet plan continued.

Last year the Helsinki Accord gave the Soviet Union essentially what
she had wanted for 20 years--a ratification of her conquests in
Eastern Europe. By thus signaling to the imprisoned countries behind
the Iron Curtain that we consider them to be within the Soviet sphere,
we reduce any tendency they might have to revolt in case of war. The
Soviet western flank is thus made far more secure than before.

In the past several years, countries have been falling into the Soviet
orbit at a quickening pace with their domination shared secretly by
their Corporate Socialist allies here in America. At the same time,
the declining military might of the United States and the fast
increasing threat from the Soviet Union has finally become too obvious
to hide any longer. This stage, too, was foreseen and planned.

All of the economic, political, and military factors are intended to
lead to a "Declaration of National Emergency" here in America,
dictatorship, and war!

But, as it turned out, there is a terrible joker in the deck that has
been dealt by the Rockefeller empire in its hidden collaboration with
the Soviet Union. The war to come, NUCLEAR WAR ONE waged primarily on
American soil, was supposed to be neatly limited and controlled with a
"Nuclear Safe Zone" set aside for the Soviet allies here in America,
as I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 last May; but the Soviet
Union has for months been maneuvering to carry out a double cross at
this critical stage in America's increasing vulnerability. They want
to seize all the marbles for themselves.

Topic #2--For many years American strategic defense strategy has been
based on a concept called "Mutual Assured Destruction", or MAD. The
idea here is that should either the Soviet Union or the United States
launch a nuclear attack on the other, the victim of the attack would
be able to destroy the attacker in return. In this concept,
furthermore, the targets are cities, not military targets such as
enemy missile installations. An ICBM attack under these conditions
would have only one basic purpose--to kill tens of millions of
innocent civilians. This is the so-called "balance of terror" we often
hear about.

In World War II, Hitler used V-1 buzz bombs and V-2 missiles in
exactly this way against the civilian population of England instead of
against military targets, thinking to terrorize England into
submission. But as we all know, it didn't work. The British learned to
dig into bomb shelters, absorb the civilian deaths and damage, and
meanwhile redoubled their efforts at military installations to strike
back at Hitler in more important ways.

The MAD mutual terror defense strategy is nothing more than a nuclear
age version of the very technique that was proven to be useless over
30 years ago. We've all heard countless times, quote: "The last thing
the Soviet Union would ever want is a nuclear exchange with the United
States." This comforting statement tends to make one accept the
foolish MAD defense doctrine, if it is to be believed; but it is
wrong. The announcement by Nikita Khrushchev in 1956 that all-out war
was not inevitable with the West after all, appeared to be a
renunciation of a basic Leninist principle, but it was not. It was
simply the beginning of an elaborate 20-year ploy to make us lower our
guard so that when the inevitable all-out conflict did come, the
Soviet Union would be in a position to win.

History is repeating itself. In the late 1930's many people made the
mistake of believing that Hitler did not actually want war but was
willing to risk it in order to obtain concessions, so the concessions
were made with the idea that this would prevent war. Only too late was
it realized that Hitler was determined to have a war one way or
another.

In the past, the Soviet Union has been notably cautious when skirting
the fringes of a possible nuclear war, but that was while she was
still at a disadvantage militarily. Now for the first time the Soviets
are emerging into a totally new situation in which their military
power is second to none. With the rapid collapse of free governments
now occurring around the globe, the over-all correlation of forces, as
they call it, is shifting rapidly in favor of the Soviet Union. The
Soviet Union is now No. 1  in military power, while the United States
is No. 2--a situation that has never existed before.

The time is now ripe for the Soviets to press their advantage in an
effort to seize control of the world. The standing threat from Red
China is often mentioned hopefully as a major factor tending to offset
any Soviet ideas of waging major war against us; but this, too, is in
error. The Soviet fear of Red China, far from acting as a brake, is
spurring them on. Right now Red China is leaning on the United States;
but should the United States be knocked out of action by a Soviet
hammer blow before China could take adva ntage of the situation, China
would then be isolated. Red China would then have no choice but to
patch things up with the Soviet Union and cooperate, at least on
pragmatic matters. Of course with the United States defeated, and the
two Communist superpowers joining forces once again, the fate of the
rest of the world would no longer be in question. Thus, as I stated in
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15, if we fall, the world falls; and that is
the basis of Soviet strategy.

Thus the Soviet Union does want nuclear war with the United States
provided the Soviet Union is prepared to survive with losses limited
to acceptable levels, and provided the United States can be destroyed
as a military rival in the process. The Soviet rulers emphatically do
not think of nuclear war as something that could only happen as the
unwanted result of a confrontation, even though this is how we tend to
think of it. To them war, including nuclear war, is a tool of conquest
to be used whenever it is advantageous to do so.

People have asked the question: Why would the Soviet Union plant
underwater missiles in our waters when they already have ICBMs,
missile-launching submarines, and so forth? Even some officials who
know about the Soviet missiles raise this question in various forms as
a smoke screen to create doubt. For once you understand the basic
Soviet viewpoint I have described, the reasons for the planting of
underwater missiles become far easier to grasp.

To begin with, the underwater missiles constitute a first-strike
capability for the Soviet Union--that is, they are concentrated on
military targets. Specifically, they are intended to wipe out our
naval bases, major ports, and a good fraction of our naval fleet in
one sudden, surprise blow without advance warning. This type of first
strike is quite different from those usually discussed, but would be
extremely effective. Consider the choice faced by an American
president immediately after such a sudden strike by the Soviet Union
by means of its underwater missiles followed by a Soviet ultimatum to
surrender! True, the American naval forces at sea around the world at
the time of the attack would be unaffected and our missile subs could
give the Soviet Union an unpleasant pasting. Even our ICBMs might
still be available to fire, but what then?

First, the damage we could now inflict on the Soviet Union would be
minimized by the mammoth Civil Defense preparations that have been
under way in the Soviet Union for five years and more. If the
president did choose to counterattack, several million Soviet citizens
would possibly die and a small portion of the military and industrial
facilities of the Soviet Union not underground would be destroyed. But
the vast majority of the Soviet population would survive our
counterattack as would a large part of their military-industrial
complex. Now it would be their turn again.

The price we would pay for disobeying the Soviet ultimatum would be
awesome. A salvo of ICBMs, not the whole Soviet ICBM force, perhaps
but a few hundred nonetheless, would rain down on the United States,
hitting both military targets and big cities. Thanks to the well named
MAD defense strategy we have followed, we have no Civil Defense and
the carnage would be beyond imagination, especially since Soviet
nuclear warheads are many times more powerful than ours.

As for our naval forces, attacks by Soviet antiship cruise missiles
would rapidly take their toll; and the inability of returning to port
for fuel and more weapons would cause our navy to wither away as a
fighting force. It would only be a matter of time until our vital sea
lanes of commerce were totally destroyed. The process might continue
perhaps for some time, but the outcome would not be in doubt. The
Soviet Union would be able to outlast us and outblast us once the
initial crucial strike against our navy was made with the underwater
missiles.

The secret of success of the Soviet plan is their use of a weapon
system that would enable the first strike against our navy to be a
complete surprise with extremely reliable results. The greatest
possible surprise, of course, would have been achieved if our navy had
never even known the missiles were there off our shores until the
moment they were fired. That was the surprise element that my monthly
AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 were intended to remove last summer.

Another element of surprise has to do with the warning time if a
missile is actually launched. With ICBMs, satellite surveillance can
provide a warning time of 20 minutes or so--plenty of time to launch
our own missiles in retaliation if the decision is made to do so.
Submarine-launched ballistic missiles may cut the warning time to a
few minutes. But in the case of the short-range underwater-launch
missiles, there is virtually no warning at all since they must travel
only a short distance and the time of flight is brief. By the time
they are detected and our defenses alerted, they will be exploding
over their targets.

There is only one other kind of warning, which is probably the most
important of all--advance warning of impending attack through
Intelligence channels and through reading the meaning of political
tensions. Up to now, for example, NATO defense planning has assumed
that any attack on Western Europe by the Soviet Union would be
preceded by a warning of at least three weeks. And 35 years ago there
were several advance warnings before the attack on Pearl Harbor
beginning a week or so ahead of time, but at that time these warnings
were deliberately blocked at high levels of the United States
Government because certain individuals wanted to insure that the
attack did occur! And now the chance of obtaining advance warning of
impending attack is once again reduced, thanks to the Intelligence gap
created by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger!

When the Soviet Union decides the time is ripe to attack, they do not
intend to telegraph their intentions in advance. In this regard, the
underwater missiles lurking along our shores can be invaluable to
them. Their ICBMs have too long a warning time and insufficient
accuracy and reliability for the Soviet rulers to employ them with
full confidence in a world-wide naval Pearl Harbor attack, such as I
described in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15. And if they chose to use
their missile-launching submarines for that purpose closing in to
short range to produce short flight times for their missiles, they
would risk alerting our navy that something was up because of the
peculiar deployment of their submarines.

On top of that, a world-wide surprise attack of the kind contemplated
by the Soviets depends for its success on a simultaneous strike
everywhere. Not an easy thing to achieve with missiles launched by
numerous submarines all over the world; but the underwater missiles
are made to order for a surprise attack. They lurk unseen for days,
weeks, or months until they are needed; then when they are to be
fired, the preparations for the attack can be made without any outward
sign at all, deep inside a Command Post in the Soviet Union. To launch
the attack itself, a signal need only be flashed world-wide from the
Command Post, while the observable activities of the Soviet Union,
military and otherwise, proceed in normal patterns giving no hint of
the impending attack!

When the surprise attack plan of the Soviet Union is known, the
question is no longer: Why would they plant those underwater missiles?
The question becomes: Why wouldn't they do it?

The Soviet Union is prepared to wage war with several times our own
nuclear firepower. At the same time, they are prepared to survive such
a war as a viable society with population losses of perhaps no more
than 2%. That's around five-million lives, and it is indeed very hard
for you and me to imagine deliberately accepting such losses for a
political purpose. But remember, the Soviet bosses think their way,
not our way; and if they were to suffer losses that large, our  own
losses could be 50- to 100-million!

Provided they have the ability to disable the United States Navy at
the outset with the surprise attack they have planned, the Soviets
believe th ey have little to lose and everything to gain now by their
standards in a nuclear war; and that is why the Soviet Union wants
nuclear war now.

Topic #3--Since early July 1976 short-wave radio communications
world-wide have been disrupted by what one ham radio operator
describes as, quote: "A super-enormous strong signal that sounds like
a buzz saw." Not only hams have been affected but maritime,
aeronautical, and telecommunications channels have been rendered
practically useless in some cases. The signal is a rasping sound that
pulses 10 times per second, originating from Soviet transmitters.

The monitoring branch of the Federal Communications Commission has
received a flood of complaints and has written four complaints to
Moscow about it, without any reply whatsoever. According to Robert
Kutz, chief of the FCC's International Operations Division, this
silence from the Soviet Union is very unusual, quote: "Usually they
have been very cooperative, unless there's something particularly
unique about this situation."

Indeed there is something unique about these Soviet radio signals, my
friends. They are transmissions between Moscow and Soviet submarines
world-wide by means of the Advanced Communications System I mentioned
in a recent monthly AUDIO LETTER. It is no accident that these signals
first began early in July 1976. That was the month when I first
revealed the existence of underwater missiles in American and Canadian
territorial waters planted by the Soviets. It is also no accident that
transmissions like this were first heard in 1962 during the Cuban
Missile Crisis.

The Government professes not to have any idea what these signals are
all about, but they know better. These signals are being used to
maintain tight coordination of Soviet naval activities, especially
submarine movements, in preparation for war. But one lie leads to
another; and just as you are not being told about the Soviet
underwater missiles that threaten your life and your freedom, you are
not being told the true meaning of the Soviet buzz saw signals.

There are at least 13 transmitters broadcasting these powerful signals
located mostly in Soviet or Soviet-occupied territory. Transmitters
are operating at Archangel, Leningrad, Moscow, Kiev, Odessa, Gdansk,
the Bosporus Straits, Rostov, Minsk, Warsaw, Prague, East Berlin, and
of all places Loch Ness in Scotland. The Loch Ness transmitter is
aboard a small submarine that entered the northeast end of Loch Ness
by means of the canal that connects Loch Ness to Moray Firth. If there
wasn't one before, there certainly is a Loch Ness monster now,
compliments of the Soviet Union.

These Soviet transmissions make use of a technique known as "pulse
modulation." Each of the 10 pulses per second sounds like nothing more
than a meaningless rasp to the ear, but in fact each pulse contains a
superimposed signal in code. The possible codes are endless, and a
computer is required both to create the coded pulses for transmissions
and to decode them where they are received. Therefore unless and until
Intelligence information becomes available on the details of the exact
code, it is practically impossible to intercept and understand the
Soviet messages to their subs.

But matters even more blatant than the Soviet mysterious signals are
being hidden from you. For example: Do you know about the joint Soviet
and Cuban naval and aviation maneuvers that took place from September
15 to September 23, 1976, in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico?
These war games utilized not only the new Soviet submarine base at
Cienfuegos Harbor not far from the United States naval station at
Guantanamo Bay but also Marianao and Havana, right across from
Florida! These war exercises carried a clear threat for the Panama
Canal, Puerto Rico, and our base at Guantanamo Bay; and, in addition,
ranged all along our Gulf coast as far west as Galveston, Texas. Yet
our so-called Defense Department said not one word about it, and our
sleeping press, following the non-existent lead of our controlled
major media, said nothing about it either.

Since "Red Friday", October 1, 1976, our Military from General George
S. Brown on down have been muzzled, ordered to flatly deny charges
about Soviet missiles in our waters, if pressed to comment on them.
Meanwhile, top secret Civil Defense exercises are now under way here
in Washington, D.C. and other sensitive areas for top Government
officials only, while the rest of our people are left in the dark not
only without protection but without even any official warning that war
could be imminent!

But the last straw came in just the past several days, my friends.
Last month I reported that immediately after the "Red Friday"
capitulation by President Ford to the Soviet demands advanced by
Andrei Gromyko, Soviet submarines along our east and west coasts
performed a chemical warfare experiment. Clouds of radioactive
plutonium were released into our atmosphere to drift inward and
contaminate the United States while the United States Government
cooperated by claiming that we were being plastered with radioactive
fallout from a Chinese nuclear test 10 days earlier. As I reported
last month, we were spared major effects from that experimental
plutonium release due to weather conditions that did not behave as
predicted by the Soviets. But now they are poised to do it again!

On Wednesday November 17 a large Chinese atmospheric hydrogen bomb
test was announced, and immediately we were inundated with
announcements that the radioactive cloud would reach our west coast
only three short days later--today, November 20, 1976. Last time they
claimed that the Chinese cloud took 10 days to cover the same
distance, but that was because the Soviet subs were not ready at that
time to use the Chinese blast as a cover for their chemical attack
against us. This time they can hardly wait.

As of noon yesterday, November 19, 18 Soviet submarines were deployed
at even intervals along our west coast within about 35 miles of our
shore line. They are not missile launchers but are equipped
specifically for the injection of plutonium into our air today. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is telling us not to fear the
Chinese nuclear cloud alleged to be passing over our country, but is
cooperating completely with the Soviet Union in providing a totally
false cover for the Soviet radioactive plutonium attack on our
country! In actual fact, the radioactivity created by the Chinese test
itself has not yet gone beyond Red China's own borders.

The media are reminding us how terrible Swine Flu might be, and we are
also being told of the disappointingly low number of eligible
Americans who are taking the free Government Swine Flu shots. We are
told that Swine Flu, if it breaks out, could spread like wildfire; and
now certain persons in the United States Government are cooperating
with the Soviet Union in an attack on our nation by means of
radioactive plutonium, the effects of which can be mistaken for severe
"flu" if intended dosages are achieved.

My friends, the so-called mysterious signals from the Soviet Union
stopped temporarily on November 2, but then on November 10 they
started up again because Soviet war preparations were resuming. Since
I talked with you last, 36 new missiles have been planted in our
waters in addition to those I referred to last month.

I have not given the locations of these to anyone, and for now I do
not intend to do so. Now let me tell you why. On one hand there are
those factions within the shell of a Government left here in
Washington who are actively cooperating with the Soviet Union. Some of
these are outright Soviet agents; others are part of the Corporate
Socialist network that cooperates with the Soviets for mutual
advantage at the expense of the rest of us. Some in this second group
still do not believe that a Soviet double cross has been under way for
months in the form of the underwater missiles in our waters. On the
other hand, there are many who are honestly trying to counter the
Soviet underwater missile threat acting within constraints imposed on
them.

Prior to October 1, missiles were being removed as they were pl anted
by the Soviet Union, acting on information I was providing to General
George S. Brown and to Military Intelligence. In this capacity, I have
been acting as an information channel to go around the Intelligence
gap created by Henry Kissinger.

But where is all this leading? What will happen if traitors in our
midst continue to cover up the truth about the Soviet underwater
missiles, and if patriots in our Government cannot summon the courage
to tell the truth, regardless of the consequences? What is going to
happen if that situation continues, my friends, is THERMONUCLEAR WAR
and DICTATORSHIP here in America!

Even if the United States Navy were to continue removing Soviet
missiles as they are planted--which they have been ordered NOT to do
since October 1--this would not prevent disaster. The Soviet Union is
able to plant missiles far faster than we can remove them. So the
information I have been relaying is really being used now for just one
purpose--to enable our leaders to keep abreast of the chances of
attack, and to minimize those chances until they are ready to run and
hide in the 96 underground cities of the "Federal Relocation Arc" to
ride out the war--then war can come, scorching the land and consuming
our people.

The top-secret information provided me by my sources, often at the
risk of their own lives, is not intended for the private use of
cold-blooded traitors and spineless leaders in the American
Government. It is intended to bring about exposure of the truth as the
one and only thing that can prevent a war.

If war comes, it will be a devastating surprise to most Americans. The
perverse behavior of our public officials in misusing my information
threatens to condemn millions of us to a nuclear holocaust. Therefore
it is only right that they condemn themselves at the same time.
Without the missile locations I am now withholding they, too, will be
caught in the lightning surprise attack by the Soviet Union that
threatens to engulf the rest of us. Millions of our lives apparently
mean nothing at all to them compared to their service to the Soviet
Union, and their jobs, and their pensions. But now their lives are at
stake along with the rest of us. Only if the truth about the Soviet
underwater missiles is exposed will I turn over the new information I
have on which not only our lives but theirs, too, now depend.

Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])